Нашла на английском перевод статей УК, в принципе его можно припугнуть хотя бы. За нарушение частной жизни и оскорбления есть статьи и штрафы. Скажу найму адвоката и попорчу ему жизнь официально, фотошопы в обратку это меня на его уровень поставит и я не смогу уже на него надавить. А так я думаю статейку если ему присобачат он уже никаким журналистом не поработает. На работе у нас законом прописано что частная жизнь не является причиной к увольнению, если это не мешает работе, так что за голый зад меня не уволят, а его действия закроют ему дорогу во многие места и страны. Я могу еще и в америке на него подать.
Девятая секция говорит о нарушение неприкосновенности частной жизни. Article 132 - (1) Anyone who violates the privacy of communication between persons shall be punished by imprisonment of between six months and two years, or with a judicial fine. If the violation is committed by recording the contents of communication, a sentence of between one year and three years' imprisonment may be imposed.
(2) Anyone who unlawfully discloses the contents of communication between persons will be punished by imprisonment of between one and three years.
От 6 месяцев до 2 лет
Section Eight: Offences against Dignity
Insult
ARTICLE 125- (1) Anyone who undermining the honour, dignity or respectability of another person or who attacks a person's honour by attributing to them a concrete act or a fact, or by means of an insult shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of three months to two years, or punished with a judicial fine. In order to convict for an insult made in the absence of the victim, the act must have been witnessed by at least three persons.
(2) If the act is committed by means of a spoken, written or visual message addressing the victim, the perpetrator shall be sentenced to the penalties set out above.
(3) If the offence of insult is committed:
a) against a public official in connection with their duty;
b) in response to the expression of religious, political, social, philosophical beliefs, thoughts and opinions, in response to an individual's changing or attempting to propagate their religious, political, social, philosophical beliefs, thoughts and opinions, or in response to an individual's compliance with the requirements and prohibitions of their religion;
c) by reference to the holy values of a person's religion, the penalty shall be not less than one year.
(4) (Amended by Law 5377 of 29 June 2005 /Article 15) Where the offence of insult was committed in public, the penalty shall be increased by one sixth.
(5) (Amended by law 5377 of 29 June 2005 /Article 15) In the case of insults to public officials in connection with their efforts working as a committee, the offence shall be deemed to have been committed against all committee members. In such a case, the provisions related to concatenated offences shall be applied.
Determination of the Victim
Article 126 - (1) Where there is no doubt or hesitation as to the character (of the offence) and the target of the insult, it shall be deemed that the target of the insult was named and insulted, even if their name was not openly mentioned when committing the offence of insult or where the accusation was disguised.
Proof of Accusation
Article 127 - (1) The act shall not be punishable if the allegation is proven. The allegation is deemed to have been proven if the insulted person was convicted by a final judgment. In other circumstances, the acceptance of the demand for proof of the allegation shall depend on whether there is a public benefit from the clarification of the truth or falsehood of the allegation, or on whether the complainant consents to proof thereof.
(2) A punishment shall be imposed on any person who insults an individual by reference to that individual's proven act.
Inviolability of allegation and defence
ARTICLE 128 - (1) No penalty shall be imposed on account of any concrete accusations or negative remarks made against persons in the course of written or verbal applications, accusations and defences made to judicial or administrative authorities. However, in such cases, the accusations and assessments must be based on real and concrete facts and be relevant to the dispute in question.
Insult on account of a tort or reciprocal defamation
ARTICLE 129 - (1) Where the offence of insult is committed in response to a tort, the penalty to be imposed on the perpetrator may be reduced by up to one-third or may be cancelled altogether.
(2) No penalty shall be imposed on anyone who insults another person in response to a deliberate wounding inflicted upon him.
(3) In the case of reciprocal insult, depending on the extent of the incident, the penalty to be imposed on one or both of the parties may be reduced by up to one third or punishment may not be imposed.
Insult to the memory of a person
Article 130- (1) Anyone who commits under the testimony of at least three persons an offence of insult to the memory of a dead person shall be imprisoned for a term of three months to two years, or punished by a judicial fine. If the offence is committed in public it shall be increased by one sixth.
(2) If the remains of the deceased or their body is taken or their corpse or bones are subjected to degradation they shall be sentenced a term of imprisonment of from three months to two years.
Condition for investigation and prosecution
ARTICLE 131 - (1) Excluding insults committed against a public officer on account of their duty, the investigation and prosecution of an offence of insult shall be subject to the filing of a complaint by the injured party.
(2) If the injured party dies before filing the complaint or if the offence is committed against the memory of a deceased person, a complaint may be filed by the antecedent or descendant relatives of the deceased up to the second degree or by his spouse or brothers and sisters.
Section 9: Offences against Privacy
Violation of privacy of communication
Article 132 - (1) Anyone who violates the privacy of communication between persons shall be punished by imprisonment of between six months and two years, or with a judicial fine. If the violation is committed by recording the contents of communication, a sentence of between one year and three years' imprisonment may be imposed.
(2) Anyone who unlawfully discloses the contents of communication between persons will be punished by imprisonment of between one and three years.
(3) Anyone who discloses a communication with someone else in public without the consent of the other person will be punished by imprisonment of between six months and two years or a judicial fine.
(4) If the contents of communication between persons are published via press and publications, the sentence will be increased by one half.
Wiretapping and recording of communications
ARTICLE 133 - (1) Anyone who monitors private conversations between persons, without the consent of either of the parties, by means of a tapping device, or who records such conversations by means of a sound recording device, shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of from two to six months.
(2) Anyone who records a public conversation without the consent of the other participating speakers by means of a sound recording device shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of up to six months or a judicial fine.
(3) Anyone who profits from information which he is known to have obtained or which he may be deemed to have obtained by committing an act referred to in the above paragraphs or who supplies that information to other persons or who enables other persons to obtain information shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of from six months to two years and a judicial fine of up to one thousand days. Where such a conversation is published through the medium of the press and publications, the penalty to be imposed shall be the same.
Violation of Privacy
ARTICLE 134 - (1) Anyone who violates the privacy of others' personal lives shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of from six months to two years or an administrative fine. Where the violation of privacy occurs as a result of recording of images or voice/sound, the minimum penalty shall be not less than one year.
(2) Anyone who discloses images or sounds of others' private lives shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of from one to three years. Where the offence is committed through the press or media, the penalty shall be increased by one half.
Recording of personal data
ARTICLE 135 - (1) Anyone who illegally records personal data shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of from six months to three years. (2) Anyone who illegally records personal information data concerning others' political, philosophical or religious opinions, their racial origins, their unlawful moral tendencies, sexual lives, their health problems or their relations with trade unions shall be punished by imprisonment in accordance with the above provision.
Unlawful acquisition or disclosure of data
ARTICLE 136 - (1) Anyone who imparts to others, distributes or acquires personal data unlawfully shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of from one to four years.
False information concerning Companies and Cooperatives
Article 164 - (1) Founders, partners, administrators, directors or representatives or board members or liquidators of a company or cooperative that supply important false information or permit such information to be supplied in their declarations to the public or reports to the general assembly, or make recommendations that may lead to harm for the concerned party shall be punished by from six months to three years' imprisonment or with a judicial fine of up to 1000 days.
надо будет попробовать, просто не думала, что это повлияет как то. Можно еще обьяву на гейском сайте знакомств и линк всем родственникам и работодателям. А что в Турции такая нетерпимость к геям?
У них же как, у моральных уродов? "Кто отвечает за эту женщину?", ни кто, значит все можно.
, но если чо, фотомонтаж в обратку, не, не из мести, чисто по приколу и полный игнор
как вы это представляете?
